← Search

Amy Barnett

Huntersville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 87W–73L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amy Barnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-08-24 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shumbriar Ostapko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Labar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
Kathryn Burdick / Cynthia Friess
2026-08-17 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patty Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · SLABA-Barnett/ Bailey Simply Smashing · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · SLABA-Barnett/ Bailey Simply Smashing · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Yin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Howland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-5
L
2026-07-13 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Yin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-06 · SLABA-Barnett/ Bailey Simply Smashing · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Bogojevich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-28 · MLSCU-Cune-Yin/ 40+MIXED DrINKS 3.5 Mon pm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Howland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-0
W
2026-06-22 · SLABA-Barnett/ Bailey Simply Smashing · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60.4%
29W–19L · 54.1% of games
3.5
46.3%
19W–22L · 48.7% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.1% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 58.2% of games
6.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.1% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 42% of games
3.5mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#1 Singles
16%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova