← Search

Darrell Ingold

Holbrook, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 54W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Darrell Ingold to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Deer Park, Bunting · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Bunting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Deer Park, Bunting · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Permiceo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · Deer Park, Bunting · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Bunting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-5
W
2026-07-08 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · Deer Park, Bunting · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Bunting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Deer Park, Bunting · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Bunting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Byrne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · Deer Park, Bunting · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kuldeep Barot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
46.2%
42W–49L · 48.2% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.5% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams