← Search

John Ramo

— year-end
81 matches · 50W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add John Ramo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-07-30 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Bunting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Kupfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ricky Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Kupfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louis Zamboli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Artem Shkaraban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-25 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louis Zamboli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ricky Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Calandra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ricky Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 63.7% of games
3.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 53.3% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
16 matches
#1 Singles
17%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova