← Search

Lisa Franson

— year-end
280 matches · 174W–106L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lisa Franson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history280 matches
L
Kelly Baker / Lyles Downs
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Junko Stout championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Pia Lehtonen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · #4 Doubles · with Elizabeth Murray championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Rhonda Wells / Melissa Johnson
2026-06-25 · Warner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Elizabeth Ford
2026-06-24 · Warner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Cannada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · Warner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Britt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · Warner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Christy Brock / Elizabeth Cannon
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Kim Thriffiley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
Madison Claytor / Annemarie Claise
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · with Rhonda Tullos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Caitlin Michaelis
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams86 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79%
94W–25L · 60.1% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.5
73.2%
41W–15L · 57.1% of games
8.0
90%
9W–1L · 67.9% of games
8.5
50%
5W–5L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#1 Singles
5%
15 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
4 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova