← Search

Emma Pullen

Brandon, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 87W–31L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emma Pullen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-07-08 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jamie Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Holston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Galey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Holston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg McNair mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Sing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Bailey, Ben · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Carpenter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnny White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Holston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · Bailey, Ben · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackson Pullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Holston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · Bailey, Ben · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Carpenter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 72.3% of games
3.5
82.9%
34W–7L · 59.7% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.7% of games
3.5mixed
78.8%
26W–7L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe