← Search

Amanda Galey

Brandon, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 54W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Galey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Campbell, Leslie · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-25 · Campbell, Leslie · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Beth Cantrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
Gena Holley / Nancy Thompson
2026-08-19 · Woodruff, Elissa · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Woodruff, Elissa · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelley White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-25 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cindy Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-01 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emma Pullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg McNair mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Sing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 50.6% of games
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 56.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 30.3% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 55% of games
7.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.8% of games
3.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer