← Search

Katrina Knight

— year-end
16 matches · 12W–4L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Katrina Knight to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Knight · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lee Ann Zierenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-29 · Knight · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lee Ann Zierenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Candy Pegram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Nelson 40s · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Coo Hocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Nelson 40s · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Coo Hocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-13 · PEGRAM/GILBERT · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Coo Hocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-08 · PEGRAM/GILBERT · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Nelson 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candy Pegram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-25 · PEGRAM/GILBERT · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Coo Hocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · PEGRAM/GILBERT · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-11 · PEGRAM/GILBERT · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Coo Hocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-08 · Nelson 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candy Pegram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.1% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams