← Search

Judi Leseur

— year-end
37 matches · 21W–16L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Judi Leseur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Gardner/Gore · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Barbara Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · Williamson/Wilson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Helen Cressy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · Williamson/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-29 · Gardner/Gore · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-14 · Williamson/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-12 · Gardner/Gore · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-15 · Robinson St. James · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Baumeister mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · Robinson St. James · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Baumeister mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
Margie Shuffler / Charles Davis
2026-06-24 · Robinson St. James · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Montany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-12 · GILLEN HASKINS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tess Casals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-05 · Campbell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-05 · GILLEN HASKINS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Gillen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.6% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.5% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.9% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams