← Search

Angie Cagle

Ocean Springs, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 43W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angie Cagle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Fitzgerald - BBTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-31 · Fitzgerald - BBTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with DeAnn Fontenot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · BBTC - Dawkins 2026 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · BBTC - Denmark · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erick Coomer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · BBTC - Cagle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Johnny Frazier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · BBTC - Cagle · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Johnny Frazier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · BBTC - Denmark · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Mixon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · BBTC - Cagle · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martin Coy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · BBTC - Patin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Creel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · BBTC - Denmark · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Mixon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Stephanie Chapman / Glenn Freeman
2026-05-18 · BBTC - Cagle · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyler Patin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-06 · BBTC-Creel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with DeAnn Fontenot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
88.5%
23W–3L · 65.1% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40% of games
6.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 50% of games
3.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 56.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova