← Search

Jordan Roussel

— year-end
62 matches · 23W–39L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jordan Roussel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
Daniel Barajas / Ryan Johnston
2026-08-18 · TOCC-Bourcy · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jared Akers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · TOCC - Radius 6.5 18+ 2026 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Mattiace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · TOCC-Bourcy · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Pete Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · TOCC-Bourcy · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Pete Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · TOCC - Blevins · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Schyler St Amant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · TOCC Tri. 18+. Radius · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Benjamin Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · TOCC - Blevins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Brumley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · TOCC Tri. 18+. Radius · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Wilkerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · TOCC - Blevins · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Pilger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · TOCC - Blevins · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Pilger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-12 · TOCC Radius · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Mcmillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-27 · TOCC Radius · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derek Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 47.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.6% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 41.5% of games
2.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
14%
9 matches
#3 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert