← Search

Amy McDonnold

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 52W–9L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Amy McDonnold to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Coody Smits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carley Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Combo No.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Carley Boyle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-3
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Carley Boyle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · Racquet Riot 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isabella Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Racquet Riot 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Maxcey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Racquet Riot 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · Tennisy Whiskey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cody Everett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-15 · Racquet Riot 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Glade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-18 · Racquet Riot 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Glade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-11 · Racquet Riot 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.8% of games
3.5
92.3%
24W–2L · 70.3% of games
4.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 60.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert