← Search

Jill Coody Smits

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 93W–52L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jill Coody Smits to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Faultless · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy McDonnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · Hit Squad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Fireballers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Dwyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Fireballers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nhan Pham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · Hit Squad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Dohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Faultless · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bethany Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · Fireballers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Dwyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Patriots · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Staley Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · Southside Bangers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Gogolin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Patriots · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-1
W
2026-05-31 · Fireballers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bryan Tutton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-30 · Faultless · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Gehring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 63% of games
4.0
69.6%
55W–24L · 58.5% of games
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova