← Search

Gatewood Thrasher

Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 34W–28L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Gatewood Thrasher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Life Time - Hutto/Chanco · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Oney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · Inverness CC Bode · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Bowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-01 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Palco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandon Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alex Zuehlke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicholas Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Frederick · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Frederick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Bode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Frederick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gustavo Nieves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Frederick · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 52.7% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 41.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.5% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe