← Search

Brandon Mathis

Birmingham, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 34W–47L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Brandon Mathis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-09-10 · ICC - Mathis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason McCay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Sandidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · ICC - Mathis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brad Sandidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gatewood Thrasher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason McCay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisle Hites
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Mathis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Mathis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Mathis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-12 · ICC - Mathis Spring (Tu/Th) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Swindle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · ICC - Mathis Spring (Tu/Th) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Swindle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
57.5%
23W–17L · 51.1% of games
3.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 31.5% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.5% of games
3.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert