← Search

Cindy Hoit

Colorado Springs, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 88W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Hoit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history183 matches
L
2026-08-07 · CSRC ANDERSON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Mark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-13 · CSRC COYLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra VanDeVeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-29 · CSRC COYLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · CSRC ANDERSON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Shipwash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · CSRC COYLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denice Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · CSRC COYLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra VanDeVeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · CSRC COYLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Stier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · CSCC PEPPER · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Pepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-08-08 · CSRC ANDERSON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-01 · CSRC ANDERSON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-25 · CSRC ANDERSON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori McPherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-18 · CSRC ANDERSON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori McPherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
62.2%
28W–17L · 54% of games
3.5
40.4%
19W–28L · 45.4% of games
6.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.7% of games
7.0
30%
12W–28L · 40.9% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
45 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams