← Search

Sherri Partlow

Highlands Ranch, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 118W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sherri Partlow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
W
2026-09-03 · HRCA-S YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · HRCA-S YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freestone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · HRCA-S BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vageesh Kumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · HRCA-S BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-06 · HRCA-S YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freestone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · HRCA-S BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jon Uman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freestone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · HRCA-S YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freestone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Lisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Toni Chalmers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · SS-LGT RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Stark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · HRCA-N ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Stark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 64% of games
3.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 59% of games
3.5
56.1%
60W–47L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 54.7% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#1 Female Singles
7%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert