← Search

Birgitte Sandgaard

CASTLE ROCK, CO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 49W–35L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Birgitte Sandgaard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-09-03 · PRC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franny Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · PRC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franny Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · PRC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenifer Chappel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · PRC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henriette Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jaime West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Erin Rhodes / Melissa Gateley
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Kathleen Beyes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · PRC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-10 · PRC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henriette Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenifer Chappel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · PRC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henriette Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · PRC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henriette Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · PRC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Miles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.8%
30W–21L · 52.9% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.5% of games
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer