← Search

Brad Parfait

Lafayette, LA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
45 matches · 7W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brad Parfait to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-05-07 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-12 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christian Patt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-05 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christian Patt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-29 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-22 · Patt/18 3.0M/BEVR/LFT · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-09 · Mackensen/18/6.5/Combo/BVR/LFT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathan Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-04 · Mackensen/18/6.5/Combo/BVR/LFT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathan Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 45.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 24% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 25.5% of games
6.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.9% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.4% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
23 matches
#2 Singles
24%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams