← Search

Rene Fields

— year-end
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rene Fields to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Kumar/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marian Vangeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · Kumar/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Roh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · Kumar/Plumlee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · Kumar/Plumlee/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Penny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · Kumar/Plumlee/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · Kumar/Plumlee/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-02 · Kumar/Plumlee/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Penny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-20 · Kumar/Plumlee/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-09-22 · Venable/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-18 · Venable/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-08-04 · Venable/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-16 · Venable/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.7% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#1 Singles
18%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova