← Search

Ginger Childs

Brentwood, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 49W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ginger Childs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Shalk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Preeti Arla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elita Shalkevich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · Shalk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Schoonover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Han
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · Shalk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-15 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Drew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Shalk/Villalta/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Simpson/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Carrie Jones / Kathleen Carbonari
2026-04-15 · Anderson/Villalta/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-14 · Shalk/Villalta/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Han
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 67.5% of games
3.5
62.9%
22W–13L · 55.7% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 45.4% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 69.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
20%
15 matches
#2 Singles
14%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer