← Search

Haidee Cline

Henrico, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 91W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Haidee Cline to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Belmont Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Paladino-strater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Belmont Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Belmont Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Ley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Westwood Walek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Wright Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · 3 Avalon Pearsall/Voeks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Westwood Walek · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Zach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · Avalon Ghita 7.0 Mix 40 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Milligan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-21 · Westwood Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Waller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · Westwood Walek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-5
L
2026-06-13 · Westwood Walek · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Waller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-1
W
2026-06-11 · 3 Avalon Pearsall/Voeks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Pearsall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Avalon Ghita 7.0 Mix 40 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrei Fulga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
65.5%
36W–19L · 57.3% of games
4.0
25.4%
15W–44L · 39.2% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 63.2% of games
7.0mixed
65.8%
25W–13L · 57.5% of games
7.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#1 Singles
19%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#2 Singles
9%
16 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert