← Search

Carlyle Walek

Henrico, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 131W–89L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Carlyle Walek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Westwood Cruel Summer - Murtaugh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-10 · KRA Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Gerecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-09-10 · KRA Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Seredni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-04 · KRA Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Seredni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · Westwood Cruel Summer - Murtaugh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · KRA Gerecke · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Murtaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Westwood Cruel Summer - Murtaugh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aubrey Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Westwood Weekenders - Hause · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-11 · KRA Gerecke · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Gerecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Hayley Herrin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Sarah Baker / Catherine Lugez
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Hayley Herrin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Hayley Herrin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
100%
13W–0L · 74.3% of games
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 57.8% of games
3.5
64.8%
46W–25L · 56.7% of games
4.0
37.8%
14W–23L · 48.2% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.5% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.5% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova