← Search

Stacy Ludwig

— year-end
40 matches · 16W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Stacy Ludwig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-07-06 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Ludwig Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Wehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Ludwig Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Wehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-15 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christeen Paulison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-03 · Ludwig Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Wehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Ludwig Summer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kari Tarpey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-13 · Ludwig Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Streif
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Reidinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-06 · Ludwig Summer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracie Medina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · Jacoby: Jac/Lud/Col/Wil · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-25 · Ludwig Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Bachmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-11 · Ludwig Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Bachmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 48.8% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova