← Search

Maggie Hillmer

— year-end
70 matches · 39W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Maggie Hillmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Vandenbrook Vintage Volleyers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-24 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · Vandenbrook Vintage Volleyers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · Vandenbrook Vintage Volleyers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Sandberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-20 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodie Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-07 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams62 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.7%
29W–25L · 51.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.3% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert