← Search

Katie Winder

— year-end
10 matches · 3W–7L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Katie Winder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2025-07-26 · GSCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Roggie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-07-07 · GSCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keely Eberly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-09 · GSCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mckenzie Winder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-07 · GSCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miranda Wagler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-28 · GSCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Afton Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-11 · GSCC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Roggie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-10 · GSCC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mckenzie Winder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-20 · GSCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miranda Wagler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2024-05-13 · GSCC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mckenzie Winder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-06 · GSCC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams3 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 80% of the time
#3 Doubles
80%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe