← Search

Allison Kaelberer

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 113W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Allison Kaelberer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-09-03 · GCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · GCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Breanna Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · GCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with CJ Kaelberer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · GCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · GCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with CJ Kaelberer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · GCC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Guto de Araujo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · GCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with CJ Kaelberer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · GCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rima Hea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-07-02 · GCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Clough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73%
54W–20L · 60% of games
3.5
37.5%
27W–45L · 46.5% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
41.9%
13W–18L · 44.4% of games
7.5mixed
40%
6W–9L · 42.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
40 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert