← Search

Jennifer Parnell

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 123W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Parnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-09-01 · CP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Shiveley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · CP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Shiveley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · SKY RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Parnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · SKY RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Parnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · CP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Loudis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · SKY RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tom Parnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · CP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruta Cariov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · SKY BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Parnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · SKY TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Agelopoulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · SKY TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Hermansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · SKY TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · SKY BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Parnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
2.5
80%
16W–4L · 66.8% of games
3.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 68.5% of games
3.5
77.6%
38W–11L · 60.4% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.8% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 62.8% of games
6.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 59.5% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Singles
16%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
15 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe