← Search

Carolyn Michels

Alpharetta, GA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 92W–47L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Carolyn Michels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelley Barden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Edenwilde (Robin Schorr)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · Edenwilde (Robin Schorr)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Storm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-07 · Edenwilde (Robin Schorr)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · Edenwilde (Robin Schorr)* · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Haverdink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
67.4%
89W–43L · 56.3% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova