← Search

Uma Storm

— year-end
9 matches · 4W–5L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Uma Storm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history9 matches
W
2026-06-29 · MCAC:Taylor:Wright · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · MCAC:Taylor:Wright · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-18 · MCAC:Taylor:Wright · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · MCAC:Taylor:Wright · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L
2024-05-13 · MCAC:Taylor's Swifties:Taylor:WrightD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Loedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-05-20 · MCAC:Taylor:Taylor/Wright · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherry Crockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2023-05-15 · MCAC:Taylor:Taylor/Wright · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Peek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kathleen Albrecht / Stephanie Howe
2019-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vivian Normandeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
Patricia Spears / Marian Taylor
2019-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Teams4 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova