← Search

Jane Craig

Eastham, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 119W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Craig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-07-20 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyra Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyra Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · MCAC:Waldron:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Waldron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Dias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
W
2026-06-18 · MCAC:Waldron:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyra Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyra Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
W
2026-06-11 · MCAC:Waldron:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyra Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Dias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · MCAC:Waldron:Majewski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shea Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyra Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · with Gregory Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
David Freel / Chelsea Crowder
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Gregory Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 59.3% of games
4.0
69.5%
41W–18L · 60.1% of games
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
79.2%
19W–5L · 62.5% of games
8.0mixed
76.4%
42W–13L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams