← Search

Regina Allegretti-Davenport

— year-end
115 matches · 71W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Regina Allegretti-Davenport to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gita Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gita Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Carelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Willowbrook Wildwomen 65+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allyson Davidov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Gloria Catinchi / Lauren D'amico
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Gerstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Shelley Terry / Lisa DelGiudice
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blakeley Lowry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club: Rally Tolerance · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frances Kellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-11 · CRRC Wildcats · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · W/R: CRRC: Mixed Smashers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Kaiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-02 · CRRC Wildcats · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dinah Baken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club: Rally Tolerance · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-21 · CRRC Wildcats · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Friedberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72%
36W–14L · 58% of games
6.0
63.6%
28W–16L · 57.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 33% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 62.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
32 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova