← Search

Lisa Olney

— year-end
296 matches · 163W–133L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Lisa Olney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history296 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Armonk Tennis Club: Honey Deuces 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-5
L
2026-07-19 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Amidor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Lisa Murakami / Alison Malone
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · CST Hot Flashes 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Amidor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kinstlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Elaine Bailenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams63 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.2%
58W–27L · 60.6% of games
3.5
43.8%
60W–77L · 46.5% of games
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.7% of games
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.1% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
22W–16L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
112 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
90 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert