← Search

Kelly Fitz

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 201W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kelly Fitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history272 matches
W
2026-08-25 · WP-G PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chad Whitmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-2
W
2026-08-23 · WP-G PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Fitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
Jennifer Bell / Janice Ramirez
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with BethAnn Parsons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with BethAnn Parsons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Kara Gwinn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · WP-G PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Fitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · WP-G PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan MacDowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with BethAnn Parsons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Tim Fitz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Tim Fitz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-23 · DTP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Gwinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · CM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Fredricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.2%
112W–35L · 59.5% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.9% of games
7.5mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 63.8% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#1 Singles
16%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
36 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova