← Search

Janice Ramirez

Greenwood Village, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 94W–35L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Janice Ramirez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-27 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · RRTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · RRTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean Sim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Bell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Jonna Mulqueen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Bell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jonna Mulqueen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Bell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · RRTC PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · RRTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonna Mulqueen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · RRTC PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Elam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.4% of games
3.0
73.2%
52W–19L · 58.6% of games
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 60.9% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
23%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova