← Search

Kim Fredrick

— year-end
88 matches · 46W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Fredrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Ball Whackers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Ball Whackers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Chester Volley Girls · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aftan Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Susan Loraine / Laura Walsh
2026-04-16 · Smart Aces 3.5 40+ Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-10 · Ball Whackers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-17 · Ball Whackers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Schwaninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
3.5
48.6%
36W–38L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal