← Search

Brenda Munds

Wichita, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 116W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brenda Munds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
W
2026-01-10 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · Foster/White-WCC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Moxley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-03 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
W
2025-12-11 · Foster/White-WCC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Moxley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-12-06 · KS/Zrubek/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-22 · White/Ball-Genesis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Dinkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-13 · Foster/White-WCC · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Haycook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-01 · White/Ball-Genesis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitzi Hackney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-09-09 · White · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alisa Franco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-08-10 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with ABDULLA NAIM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-27 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with ABDULLA NAIM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-07-20 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kahlil Saad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.1%
53W–31L · 55.6% of games
4.0
29.4%
10W–24L · 42.8% of games
6.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.9% of games
7.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 58.2% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams