← Search

Hamid Ali

Port Jefferson Station, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 26W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hamid Ali to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Subject
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-18 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with MIKE VOYACK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-08 · Blue Point, Freeman/Subject · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kruger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-30 · Blue Point, Freeman/Subject · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-23 · Blue Point, Freeman/Subject · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-17 · Blue Point, Freeman/Subject · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Mcnally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-10 · Quogue, Caico · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-16 · Quogue, Caico · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Byrnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-31 · Quogue, Caico · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Darvin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-12 · Quogue, Caico · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-12-13 · Quogue, Caico · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evelyn Wilkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-10-20 · Quogue, Caico · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Pawlowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
34.1%
14W–27L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
37.9%
11W–18L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert