← Search

Steve Subject

Rocky Point, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 64W–149L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Subject to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-08-10 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Armando Lastra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Armando Lastra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Drozd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hamid Ali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-19 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Horatio Wildman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-18 · Blue Point, Subject/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · LIHR, Adams/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Barrie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · LIHR, Adams/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
37.3%
19W–32L · 47.5% of games
4.0
27.5%
14W–37L · 40.3% of games
8.0
30%
15W–35L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
11.8%
4W–30L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer