← Search

Jill Smith

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 57W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-09-03 · HW GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith van Wyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · HW GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith van Wyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · HW GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniele Dattilo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · HW RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Eidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · HW RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Francis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · HW RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Eidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-18 · HW TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-15 · HW TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniele Dattilo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-05-08 · HW TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniele Dattilo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-09-05 · HW BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissie Marotto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-30 · HW BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-07-26 · HW BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith van Wyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
62.6%
57W–34L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams