← Search

Fauna MacKillip

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
290 matches · 167W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Fauna MacKillip to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history290 matches
L
2026-09-03 · HRCA-N PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ramon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · HRCA-N PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivani Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · HRCA-N PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · HRCA-N PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivani Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · HRCA-N PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Langenderfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · LEBTC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Langenderfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · HRCA-N PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivani Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · SS-LT GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · LEBTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Langenderfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Allison Langenderfer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · SS-LT GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · LEBTC NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
85.4%
35W–6L · 64.9% of games
3.0
63.5%
61W–35L · 55.8% of games
3.5
38.2%
39W–63L · 46.3% of games
6.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.4% of games
7.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 50.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
78 matches
#1 Singles
24%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
34 matches
#1 Female Singles
11%
32 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe