← Search

Chiali Register

Brandon, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 50W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Chiali Register to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Campbell, Leslie · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · Campbell, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Kennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-25 · Campbell, Leslie · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Kennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-08-06 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Temple Waddell-Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Owens, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Owens, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessie Humble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · Owens, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessie Humble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · Owens, Leslie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-30 · Otto, Jen · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-23 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-26 · Harrell, Kimberly · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 59% of games
4.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 65.5% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.4% of games
8.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.1% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer