← Search

Rachel Lamont

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 44W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Lamont to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-05-07 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers/Foy · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ivana Grbelja
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers/Foy · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kymball Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-16 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers/Foy · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers/Foy · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Walzer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Walzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · Walzer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Fautin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · Walzer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Walzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · Walzer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Fautin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-10-05 · Eccles Tennis Center-Utgaard · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-03 · Eccles Tennis Center-Utgaard · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nittaya Phonharath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-29 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Walzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-22 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 54.6% of games
4.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.8% of games
4.5
27.6%
8W–21L · 44.1% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.2% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.2% of games
9.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
28 matches
#1 Singles
23%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams