← Search

Elizabeth Barnacle

Greenwood Village, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 138W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Barnacle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
N/A
2026-08-09 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Cremer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Thornock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Beckstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cadkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juliet Beckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Rankin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chelsea Ye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · HG RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cadkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · HG RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cadkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Rankin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · HG RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Cadkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · GAC BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.7% of games
4.0
53.5%
53W–46L · 50.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 60.3% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
62.3%
33W–20L · 55.9% of games
8.5mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
48 matches
#1 Singles
8%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert