← Search

Judy Wagner

— year-end
166 matches · 111W–55L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Judy Wagner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
W
2026-09-13 · NITA E 35W18c Rush Copley-Saxe/Hanlon · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-11 · NITA E 35W40a Naperville-Gabel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Rippetoe-Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-01 · NITA S 80W65a Vaughan-Wiet · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
W
2026-07-18 · NITA S 80W65a Vaughan-Wiet · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · NITA S 35W40 Naperville-Gabel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · NITA S 80W65a Vaughan-Wiet · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · NITA S 35W40 Naperville-Gabel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Jessica Barnes
2026-06-15 · NITA S 35W40 Naperville-Gabel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · NITA S 80W65a Vaughan-Wiet · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 2.Naper Wiet Tue 1 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Blaauw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · NITA W 70W65b Naperville-Martinez · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Rippetoe-Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 2.Naper Wiet Tue 1 $24 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Musgrave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.1%
66W–42L · 59.3% of games
7.0
78.6%
33W–9L · 64.3% of games
8.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 61% of the time
#1 Singles
61%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova