Martha Lloyd
Northbrook, IL
364 matches · 216W–148L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Martha Lloyd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history364 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
Christy Schaefer / Judy Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
Laura Hansen / Mimi Paffrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 55W8.0 7.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
NITA E 80W55d Score-Hennessy/Matkovic
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 9Nielsen Lund Sun 4 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 5Barr Gray Sat 9 $25
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 7.Nielsen Lund Sun 5 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $22
CDTA S TriWLo 3.SBC Martinez Wed 7 $27
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 6.Nielsen Lund Sun 4 $25
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 6.Barr Gray Sat 9 $27
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20
NITA E 80W55a Schaumburg-Adams
NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams
NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic
NITA W 70W65b Naperville-Martinez
NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
58%
76W–55L · 53.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.6% of games
8.0
63.4%
104W–60L · 54.9% of games
8.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
160 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
105 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
98 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.