← Search

Sheri Feast

— year-end
148 matches · 83W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sheri Feast to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-04-16 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Chudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabine Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-05-22 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-17 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carli Fettig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-05-15 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-04-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-12 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karina McAffee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-10 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Castelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-07 · SPANISH OAKS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-03-31 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Elizabeth Ryan / Lauren Monroe
2025-03-29 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karina McAffee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-27 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Centrella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams38 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.3%
41W–19L · 56.1% of games
4.0
34.5%
19W–36L · 41.5% of games
7.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 64.1% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe