← Search

Gracie Bailey

Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 38W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Gracie Bailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Yeatts/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Yeatts/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maddie Spickard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cy Bond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · Lane/Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · Lane/Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · KMiller/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karrie Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · KMiller/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eleanor James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-04-15 · KMiller/PVCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-03 · Lane/Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-17 · KMiller/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Avery Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 73.7% of games
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 65.3% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 49% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 68.5% of games
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#2 Singles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer