← Search

Brandi Watts

North Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 61W–40L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brandi Watts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-09-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alicia Enslin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Childers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Molly Scott / Joyce Adame
2026-08-05 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Catherine Cargile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Regina Maher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Fratesi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brice Sisco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dean Worley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
32W–16L · 57.6% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 44.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 57.1% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.3% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.5% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe