← Search

Carrie Cooper

Lees Summit, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 97W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carrie Cooper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-06-08 · Edwards, Alice · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Hoggatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · Saxer, Christy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patty Garvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · Edwards, Alice · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Hoggatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-28 · Edwards, Alice · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phoebe Davenport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Saxer, Christy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patty Garvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Edwards, Alice · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-27 · Heurtin, Kristin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stenslie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-06 · Heurtin, Kristin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Garvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · McConkey, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · Heurtin, Kristin · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · McConkey, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Hoggatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-01 · McConkey, Susan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
3.5
89.4%
42W–5L · 66.8% of games
4.0
43.8%
49W–63L · 45.6% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe