← Search

Jennifer Byers

Overland Park, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 39W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Byers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-06-07 · Wedel, Nancy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Zingg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · McCulloch, Dawna · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Fangman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · McCulloch, Dawna · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Fabrizius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · Wedel, Nancy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Missy Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · Wedel, Nancy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Case
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · Wedel, Nancy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Hope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Wedel, Nancy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-10 · Fangman, Amy · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · Bruner, Katherine · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · Bruner, Katherine · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Throm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-24 · Fangman, Amy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Creel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-10 · Fangman, Amy · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Romy Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 60.6% of games
4.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.4% of games
4.5
35.8%
24W–43L · 46.9% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams